Thursday, October 22, 2026

Colorado Make My Day Law: When Can You Use Force Against an Intruder?

Colorado’s “Make My Day” law gives people inside their homes broad protection against intruders. But the law is narrower than many people think.

It does not give you the right to shoot someone simply because they stepped onto your property. It does not automatically apply to someone standing on your porch. It does not necessarily apply to someone you invited into your home who later refuses to leave.

When the law does apply, however, its protections are significant. An occupant of a dwelling may use any degree of physical force, including deadly physical force, against an intruder if the specific requirements of the statute are satisfied. The occupant can also be immune from both criminal prosecution and civil liability.

The law is found at C.R.S. 18-1-704.5.

If you used force against someone in your home and police are investigating you, the details matter. Where the other person was standing, how that person entered, whether the person had been invited inside, what you believed was happening, and what you said afterward can all affect whether Colorado’s Make My Day law applies.

This article explains how the law actually works.
*
As with every article on this site, this is not legal advice. This is an informational article about the basics of Colorado law. Speak to an attorney about your specific situation. With situations involving self-defense, or use of deadly force, there are many variables on whether that use of force will be deemed to be a legal defense.*

Mcdowellfirm
mcdowellfirm.com
Facing Charges After a Home Incident?
McDowell Law Firm handles criminal defense cases in Colorado Springs, with personalized strategies informed by former prosecutor Josh McDowell’s experience.

Visit McDowell Law Firm

What Is Colorado’s Make My Day Law?

Colorado law starts with a strong statement from the legislature:

Colorado citizens have “a right to expect absolute safety within their own homes.”

That principle became part of Colorado law in 1985.

Under C.R.S. 18-1-704.5, an occupant of a dwelling may use any degree of physical force, including deadly physical force, against another person when the requirements of the statute are met.

Three basic things must exist.

First, the other person must have made an unlawful entry into the dwelling.

Second, the occupant must reasonably believe that the intruder has committed another crime inside the dwelling, or is committing or intends to commit a crime against a person or property, in addition to the uninvited entry.

Third, the occupant must reasonably believe that the intruder might use physical force, “no matter how slight,” against an occupant.

If those requirements are met, the statute authorizes any degree of physical force, including deadly force.

That is one of the major differences between Make My Day and ordinary self-defense.

You Do Not Have to Wait Until an Intruder Uses Deadly Force

One of the most important parts of the statute is often overlooked.

Make My Day does not require you to reasonably believe that the intruder is about to kill you or cause serious bodily injury.

The statute requires a reasonable belief that the intruder “might use any physical force, no matter how slight,” against an occupant.

That is a much different standard from Colorado’s ordinary rules governing the use of deadly force in self-defense.

Under C.R.S. 18-1-704, deadly physical force generally requires considerably more. Among other situations authorized by the statute, a person may use deadly force when the person reasonably believes a lesser degree of force would be inadequate and reasonably believes that the person or someone else is in imminent danger of death or great bodily injury.

Make My Day is different. When all of its requirements are satisfied, the statute specifically allows “any degree of physical force, including deadly physical force.”

What Counts as an “Unlawful Entry”?

This is where many cases become complicated.

It is not enough that you did not want the person inside.

Colorado courts have interpreted “unlawful entry” to require a knowing, criminal entry.

In People v. McNeese, the Colorado Supreme Court explained that an unlawful entry under the Make My Day law requires more than simply showing that someone entered without permission.

The focus is on whether the person knowingly made an unlawful entry.

That distinction can become extremely important when there is confusion about permission to enter, relationships between the parties, mistaken addresses, landlords or tenants, family members, and police officers.

An uninvited entry is not automatically an unlawful entry.

What If You Initially Invited the Person Inside?

This is another important limitation.

Make My Day applies to an unlawful entry. It does not say “enters or remains unlawfully.”

The Colorado Court of Appeals addressed exactly this issue in People v. Drennon.

In that case, the victim knocked on the defendant’s door. The defendant told him to come inside. They later argued, and the defendant told him to leave. When the man did not leave, the defendant stabbed him.

The court held that Make My Day did not apply.

The victim had been invited into the residence. His later refusal to leave did not transform his original entry into an unlawful entry for purposes of C.R.S. 18-1-704.5.

That does not mean someone has no right to defend themselves against an invited guest who becomes violent. Colorado’s ordinary self-defense laws may still apply.

It simply means the special Make My Day immunity may not.

The Intruder Must Be In a “Dwelling”

Make My Day does not apply everywhere on your property.

The Criminal Code defines a dwelling as a building that is used, intended to be used, or usually used by a person for habitation.

That means the property line is not the important line.

The boundaries of the dwelling are.

The Colorado Supreme Court addressed this issue directly in People v. Howell in 2024.

Howell was inside his mother’s apartment. Another man was outside on the doorstep. Howell fired through a security door and struck the man.

The Colorado Supreme Court held that the uncovered, unenclosed, and unsecured doorstep in that case was not part of the dwelling.

Because the other man had never entered the dwelling, Howell could not obtain Make My Day immunity based on that encounter.

That is an important distinction.

Someone can be extremely close to your house without having entered your dwelling.

What About a Porch, Garage, or Apartment Common Area?

There is no safe rule that every porch, garage, basement, or common area is either always covered or always excluded.

The question is whether the particular area qualifies as part of the “building” used for habitation.

Howell tells us that an uncovered, unenclosed, and unsecured outdoor doorstep is not part of a dwelling.

But the Colorado Supreme Court has also made clear that the analysis is not limited to the rooms where someone eats or sleeps.

In People v. Rau, the Colorado Supreme Court held that a shared basement in an apartment building could qualify as part of a tenant’s dwelling. The basement was part of the building and had uses that were incidental to the defendant’s use of his residence.

That decision is important because it rejects a simplistic rule that all shared areas of an apartment building are automatically outside the Make My Day law.

Garages and enclosed porches can present similar questions.

An attached garage that is part of the residential building may present a very different legal issue from a detached structure, driveway, open porch, or front yard.

These cases are extremely fact dependent.

Does Make My Day Apply in a Yard or Driveway?

Generally, no.

A yard or driveway is not itself a building used for habitation.

Someone trespassing on your yard does not automatically trigger Make My Day simply because that person is on your property.

Colorado has separate laws dealing with self-defense, defense of property, and defense of premises.

If the person has not unlawfully entered a dwelling, the special protection of C.R.S. 18-1-704.5 does not apply.

That does not necessarily mean the use of force was illegal. It means the conduct must be evaluated under other Colorado use-of-force laws.

Does Make My Day Apply to a Car?

Ordinarily, no.

A vehicle is not a “dwelling” simply because you happen to be inside it.

An incident involving a person entering or attacking someone in a vehicle would generally be evaluated under Colorado’s ordinary self-defense statutes rather than C.R.S. 18-1-704.5.

Again, that does not mean you cannot defend yourself inside a car. It means Make My Day is usually not the statute that determines whether the force was justified.

Make My Day Is Not the Same as “Stand Your Ground”

These concepts are frequently confused.

Colorado does not have a statute titled “Stand Your Ground.”

Instead, Colorado has long followed a no-duty-to-retreat rule through its self-defense law and court decisions.

The Colorado Supreme Court explained in cases such as People v. Toler and Idrogo v. People that a person who is otherwise entitled to use force in self-defense generally does not have to retreat before doing so. Colorado’s statutory exception applies to an initial aggressor, who generally must withdraw from the encounter and communicate that withdrawal before regaining the right to use force in self-defense.

Make My Day is different.

Make My Day is a specific statute applying to force used against someone who has unlawfully entered a dwelling under the circumstances described in C.R.S. 18-1-704.5.

It also provides something ordinary self-defense usually does not: statutory immunity from criminal prosecution for the use of force when its requirements are satisfied.

For a broader discussion, see our guide to self-defense laws in Colorado.

Make My Day Can Provide Immunity Before Trial

One of the most powerful parts of the law is the immunity provision.

This is more than simply arguing self-defense to a jury.

A defendant can ask the court before trial to dismiss charges based on Make My Day immunity.

The Colorado Supreme Court established the procedure in People v. Guenther.

At the pretrial hearing, the defendant has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the requirements for statutory immunity are satisfied.

That means the judge can hear evidence and decide the Make My Day issue before a jury trial takes place.

If the defendant establishes the right to immunity, the court must dismiss the charges to which the immunity applies.

If the judge denies immunity, however, the case is not necessarily over from a self-defense standpoint.

The defendant may still raise the force-against-intruders defense at trial when legally appropriate. At trial, once an affirmative defense is properly raised, the burden applicable to an affirmative defense shifts to the prosecution.

That distinction between pretrial immunity and the defense at trial is important.

Four Questions I Would Ask in a Make My Day Case

When I evaluate one of these cases, I would start with four questions.

  1. Did the other person actually enter a dwelling?

This can involve photographs, surveillance video, doorbell video, measurements, diagrams, and testimony about the layout of the property.

  1. Was the entry knowingly unlawful?

Was the person invited? Did someone else who lived there invite the person? Did the person reasonably believe they had permission to enter? Had the person already been inside lawfully?

  1. What other crime did the occupant reasonably believe was occurring or about to occur?

The unlawful entry alone is not enough.

  1. Why did the occupant reasonably believe the intruder might use physical force against an occupant?

That belief does not have to involve fear of death or serious bodily injury. The statute expressly says “any physical force, no matter how slight.”

Those questions usually matter much more than whether someone describes the incident as a burglary, home invasion, trespass, or self-defense.

Common Myths About Colorado’s Make My Day Law

“I can shoot anyone who comes onto my property.”

No. The statute requires an unlawful entry into a dwelling. (And there are other factors as well, as laid out above.) Someone standing in your yard or driveway has not necessarily entered a dwelling.

“If someone refuses to leave my house, Make My Day automatically applies.”

No. If you originally invited the person inside, the fact that the person later refuses to leave does not by itself satisfy the unlawful-entry requirement. People v. Drennon addressed this issue directly.

“The intruder has to have a gun.”

No. The statute does not require the intruder to be armed.

“I have to wait until the intruder attacks me.”

No. The statute requires a reasonable belief that the intruder might use physical force, no matter how slight. It does not require you to wait until the first blow is struck.

“The force has to be proportional to the intruder’s force.”

That is not how C.R.S. 18-1-704.5 is written. When all of the statute’s requirements are satisfied, it expressly authorizes “any degree of physical force, including deadly physical force.”

That is very different from ordinary self-defense, where the degree of force and the circumstances permitting deadly force are governed by C.R.S. 18-1-704.

“Make My Day means the police cannot arrest me.”

No.

Police can still investigate a shooting or other use-of-force incident. Prosecutors can still file charges.

Make My Day gives a qualifying defendant immunity from prosecution, but whether the requirements are satisfied can become a disputed legal and factual issue for a judge.

What Should You Do After a Home-Defense Shooting or Use of Force?

If someone has been seriously injured or killed, call 911 and request medical assistance.

Do not disturb or clean the scene.

Preserve doorbell cameras, home surveillance systems, text messages, phone records, photographs, damaged doors, broken locks, and anything else that could document how the person entered or what occurred.

Identify witnesses.

Be respectful and cooperative with law enforcement, but understand the difference between providing basic identifying information and giving a detailed statement about a shooting or serious use of force.

You have the right to remain silent. You also have the right to speak with an attorney before giving a detailed statement.

That can matter enormously in a Make My Day case because your beliefs at the moment force was used are part of the legal analysis.

Criminal Charges After a Self-Defense Incident

When prosecutors believe the use of force was unlawful, potential charges can range from misdemeanor assault to serious felony assault or homicide charges.

The exact charge depends on the conduct, injuries, alleged mental state, and other facts.

You can read more about Colorado assault charges here:

Different Degrees of Assault Under Colorado Law

Second-Degree Assault in Colorado

First-Degree Assault in Colorado

A self-defense case should be analyzed as a self-defense case from the beginning. The defense should not be added after the prosecution has already defined the facts.

Colorado Springs Criminal Defense Lawyer for Self-Defense Cases

I spent years as a prosecutor before becoming a criminal defense attorney.

That experience matters in a self-defense case because these cases often turn on how prosecutors interpret evidence before the case ever reaches a jury.

We look closely at the physical evidence, photographs, surveillance video, 911 recordings, witness statements, police reports, forensic evidence, and the exact layout of the location.

If Make My Day applies, we can evaluate whether to seek dismissal based on statutory immunity.

If it does not apply, we can determine whether Colorado’s ordinary self-defense laws provide a defense.

If you are facing criminal charges after defending yourself or someone else, you can learn more about our Colorado Springs criminal defense practice or contact McDowell Law Firm to discuss your case.

Colorado Make My Day Law FAQ

Can you shoot an intruder in your house in Colorado?

Potentially. Colorado law allows an occupant of a dwelling to use any degree of physical force, including deadly force, when all of the requirements of C.R.S. 18-1-704.5 are satisfied.

An unlawful entry by itself is not enough.

Does an intruder have to be armed?

No.

The statute requires the occupant to reasonably believe that the intruder might use any physical force, no matter how slight, against an occupant. It does not require the intruder to possess a weapon.

Does someone have to break down the door?

No.

Colorado’s Make My Day law does not require a forcible entry. The legal question is whether there was a knowingly unlawful entry into the dwelling.

Does Make My Day apply if someone is standing on my front step?

Not necessarily, and the Colorado Supreme Court has specifically rejected that argument in at least one important situation.

In People v. Howell, the court held that an uncovered, unenclosed, and unsecured doorstep was not part of the dwelling. The person standing there had not entered the dwelling.

What if I invited the person into my house and then told them to leave?

Make My Day generally does not apply simply because an invited guest later refuses to leave.

People v. Drennon held that the statute requires an unlawful entry and does not include merely “remaining unlawfully.”

Ordinary self-defense may still apply if the person threatens or attacks you.

Does Make My Day apply to an attached garage?

Possibly.

The answer depends on whether the particular area qualifies as part of the dwelling under Colorado law. Colorado courts look at whether the area is part of a building used for habitation and how that area relates to the residential use of the building.

This is a fact-specific issue.

Is Colorado a Stand Your Ground state?

Colorado has a long-standing no-duty-to-retreat rule, but it does not have a statute formally titled “Stand Your Ground.”

A non-aggressor who is otherwise justified in using force generally does not have to retreat before defending himself or herself.

That rule is separate from Colorado’s Make My Day statute.

Can I still claim self-defense if Make My Day does not apply?

Yes, potentially.

Failure to qualify for Make My Day immunity does not automatically mean the use of force was criminal.

Colorado’s general self-defense law under C.R.S. 18-1-704 may still justify the use of force depending on the circumstances.

C.R.S. 18-1-704.5, Use of Deadly Physical Force Against an Intruder

C.R.S. 18-1-704, Use of Physical Force in Defense of a Person

People v. Howell, 2024 CO 42

People v. McNeese, 892 P.2d 304 (Colo. 1995)

People v. Drennon, 860 P.2d 589 (Colo. App. 1993)

People v. Guenther, 740 P.2d 971 (Colo. 1987)

Idrogo v. People, 818 P.2d 752 (Colo. 1991)

People v. Toler, 9 P.3d 341 (Colo. 2000)

Other Reading

The post Colorado Make My Day Law: When Can You Use Force Against an Intruder? first appeared on McDowell Law Firm.



from McDowell Law Firm https://mcdowellfirm.com/make-my-day-law-colorado/
https://mcdowellfirm.com/practice-area/dui-defense/

Wednesday, October 21, 2026

Vehicular Assault in Colorado: Charges, Penalties and Defenses

A serious car crash can turn into a felony criminal case very quickly.

In Colorado, a driver may be charged with vehicular assault when reckless driving, driving under the influence, or driving while ability impaired causes serious bodily injury to another person.

Vehicular assault is always a felony. The seriousness of the felony depends on what the prosecution claims caused the crash.

Under C.R.S. 18-3-205:

  • Vehicular assault based on DUI is a class 4 felony.

  • Vehicular assault based on DWAI is a class 5 felony.

  • Vehicular assault based on reckless driving is a class 5 felony.

These cases are substantially more serious than an ordinary DUI or traffic case. A conviction can mean prison, probation, loss of your driver’s license, restitution, substantial fines, and a permanent felony conviction.

If you have been arrested or are under investigation for vehicular assault in Colorado Springs, it is important to understand exactly what the prosecution has to prove.

Mcdowellfirm
Get Guidance on a Vehicular Assault Case
McDowell Law Firm handles criminal defense and DUI cases in Colorado Springs, with tailored strategies and direct communication.

Visit McDowell Law Firm

What Is Vehicular Assault in Colorado?

Colorado law provides three basic ways a person can commit vehicular assault.

Vehicular Assault Based on Reckless Driving

A person commits vehicular assault if the person:

  1. Operates or drives a motor vehicle in a reckless manner;

  2. The reckless driving is the proximate cause of an injury to another person; and

  3. The injury qualifies as “serious bodily injury” under Colorado law.

This version is a class 5 felony.

A serious crash by itself does not necessarily prove reckless driving.

Colorado generally defines reckless conduct as consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk. That is different from ordinary negligence or momentary inattention.

The distinction can become extremely important in a vehicular assault case.

Vehicular Assault Based on DUI

A person also commits vehicular assault if the person:

  1. Operates or drives a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or a combination of alcohol and drugs;

  2. The driving is the proximate cause of another person’s serious bodily injury.

Vehicular assault based on DUI is a class 4 felony.

The DUI version is expressly classified as a strict liability offense under C.R.S. 18-3-205. The prosecution does not have to prove that the driver intended to cause an injury.

It still must prove the other elements of the charge, including that the defendant was driving under the influence and that the driving was the proximate cause of serious bodily injury.

Vehicular Assault Based on DWAI

Colorado also recognizes vehicular assault based on driving while ability impaired, or DWAI.

DWAI is a lower level of impairment than DUI. Under Colorado law, a person may be DWAI when alcohol or drugs affect the person “to the slightest degree” so that the person is less able than usual to exercise clear judgment, physical control, or due care in operating the vehicle.

Vehicular assault based on DWAI is a class 5 felony.

That distinction matters. A prosecutor does not necessarily have to prove full DUI-level impairment to pursue felony vehicular assault.

If your case involves alcohol or drugs, our Colorado Springs DUI defense page explains Colorado DUI and DWAI law in more detail.

Version charged Felony class
Reckless driving causing serious bodily injury Class 5
Driving while impaired (DWAI) causing serious bodily injury Class 5
Driving under the influence causing serious bodily injury Class 4

Source for the classes: C.R.S. 18-3-205.

What Does “Serious Bodily Injury” Mean?

The word “serious” has a specific legal meaning.

Colorado defines serious bodily injury in C.R.S. 18-1-901.

Serious bodily injury includes bodily injury that involves:

  • A substantial risk of death;

  • Serious permanent disfigurement;

  • Protracted loss or impairment of the function of a body part or organ;

  • A break or fracture; or

  • A second-degree or third-degree burn.

The fracture provision surprises many people.

A broken bone can qualify as serious bodily injury even if the person is expected to make a full recovery.

On the other hand, the fact that a collision looked severe does not automatically establish serious bodily injury. The prosecution must prove the injury itself meets the statutory definition.

That makes medical records, imaging, physician testimony, and the exact nature of the injury important evidence.

What Does “Proximate Cause” Mean?

An injury occurring after a crash is not enough by itself.

The prosecution must prove that the defendant’s driving was the proximate cause of the serious bodily injury.

Causation can become a major issue when several things contributed to the collision.

Examples may include:

  • Another driver’s conduct;

  • A pedestrian’s actions;

  • Weather or road conditions;

  • Poor lighting;

  • Construction;

  • Mechanical failure;

  • A sudden medical emergency;

  • The injured person’s failure to use a seat belt;

  • Multiple impacts involving several vehicles.

The existence of another contributing cause does not automatically defeat a prosecution. The question is whether the defendant’s conduct legally caused the injury.

Crash reconstruction, vehicle data, witness statements, photographs, video, and medical evidence may all become important.

Is “DUI With Injury” the Same as Vehicular Assault?

People often refer to these cases as “DUI causing injury” or “DUI with injury.”

When a DUI causes serious bodily injury, the felony charge is generally vehicular assault under C.R.S. 18-3-205.

That is very different from an ordinary misdemeanor DUI.

A standard DUI focuses primarily on whether the person drove while under the influence.

Vehicular assault requires additional proof that:

  • Another person suffered serious bodily injury; and

  • The defendant’s conduct was the proximate cause of that injury.

DUI is also a lesser-included offense of vehicular assault based on DUI. A defendant generally cannot receive separate convictions and punishments for both offenses based on the same conduct. The DUI conviction merges into the vehicular assault conviction.

For DUI cases that do not involve serious bodily injury, see our Colorado Springs DUI lawyer page.

Collision-damaged vehicles at a Colorado intersection

Blood Tests After a Serious Crash

The blood-testing rules in a vehicular assault investigation can be different from the rules people associate with an ordinary DUI arrest.

Under C.R.S. 18-3-205, if an officer has probable cause to believe a person committed alcohol or drug-related vehicular assault, the officer may require chemical testing.

The statute permits testing of blood, breath, saliva, or urine depending on the circumstances.

If a person refuses to complete or cooperate with testing, the statute permits testing to be performed at the direction of an officer with probable cause without the person’s authorization or consent.

That does not mean every blood test is automatically valid or immune from challenge.

Issues may include:

  • Whether probable cause existed;

  • Whether the seizure complied with constitutional requirements;

  • Whether the proper person drew the blood;

  • Whether the sample was properly collected and preserved;

  • Chain of custody;

  • Laboratory procedures;

  • Contamination;

  • Timing of the test;

  • Retrograde extrapolation;

  • Whether the result actually proves impairment at the time of driving.

Colorado law also provides a permissible inference of DUI when a driver’s BAC is 0.08 or higher.

For marijuana, five nanograms or more of delta-9 THC per milliliter of whole blood creates a permissible inference that the driver was under the influence of drugs. It is not an automatic finding of guilt.

Reckless Driving Versus Careless Driving

One of the most important questions in some vehicular assault cases is whether the driving was actually reckless.

Recklessness requires more than showing that the driver made a mistake.

It generally requires proof that the person consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk.

Careless driving involves a lower level of culpability.

This distinction became even more important after a change in Colorado law that took effect June 2, 2025.

Under C.R.S. 42-4-1402, careless driving that proximately causes serious bodily injury is now a class 1 misdemeanor traffic offense.

That creates a major difference in potential consequences.

Reckless driving causing serious bodily injury can support a class 5 felony vehicular assault charge.

Careless driving causing serious bodily injury can result in a class 1 misdemeanor traffic offense.

One caution is important. Colorado appellate courts have held that careless driving is not automatically a lesser-included offense of reckless vehicular assault. The relationship between the charges can therefore depend on how the prosecution filed the case and how the issues are presented at trial.

For more information about traffic offenses, see our Colorado Springs traffic defense page.

We also discuss the civil side of serious careless-driving collisions on our page about careless driving causing injury.

Penalties for Vehicular Assault in Colorado

The potential punishment depends on whether the offense is a class 4 or class 5 felony.

DUI Vehicular Assault

Vehicular assault based on DUI is a class 4 felony.

The ordinary presumptive sentencing range for a Colorado class 4 felony is:

  • 2 to 6 years in the Department of Corrections; and

  • A possible fine of $2,000 to $500,000.

Other sentencing statutes can increase the range in particular cases.

Probation may be legally available in some cases depending on the charges, criminal history, aggravating circumstances, and applicable sentencing statutes.

DWAI or Reckless Vehicular Assault

Vehicular assault based on DWAI or reckless driving is a class 5 felony.

The ordinary presumptive range for a class 5 felony is:

  • 1 to 3 years in the Department of Corrections; and

  • A possible fine of $1,000 to $100,000.

Again, aggravating circumstances, prior convictions, probation or parole status, and other sentencing provisions can change the exposure.

Vehicular assault is not automatically a Colorado “crime of violence” merely because serious bodily injury occurred. It also is not generally listed as an extraordinary-risk offense. Specific sentencing enhancements can nevertheless apply depending on the facts.

If you want a broader explanation of how Colorado judges decide between probation, jail and prison, see Am I Going to Jail? A Defense Attorney’s Guide.

Driver’s License Consequences

The criminal sentence is only part of the problem.

Colorado law requires driver’s license revocation following a conviction for vehicular assault.

An alcohol or drug case may also produce a separate administrative DMV case based on Express Consent law.

That means a person can be fighting two different proceedings:

  • The criminal case in court; and

  • The administrative license case with the Colorado DMV.

Those cases overlap, but they are not the same proceeding.

No two cases are alike, but the work usually begins with the same questions. They map onto what the prosecution must prove.

**
Bond for Vehicular Assault in El Paso County**

Bond depends on the individual case.

The current Fourth Judicial District bond schedule, Chief Judge Order 2025-07, is a reference schedule used in El Paso and Teller Counties. It does not guarantee what bond a particular judge will impose.

The schedule currently lists:

The judge must still consider the statutory bond factors and the individual facts of the case.

Conditions may also be imposed, including restrictions involving alcohol or drugs, monitored sobriety, driving, travel, firearms, contact with alleged victims, or other conditions the court considers appropriate.

How We Defend Vehicular Assault Cases

There is no single defense that applies to every vehicular assault prosecution.

The first step is identifying exactly which element the prosecution may have difficulty proving.

Was the Defendant Driving?

This sounds obvious, but it is not always clear after a serious collision.

Occupants may be injured, transported separately, unconscious, or outside the vehicle when officers arrive.

The prosecution still has to prove who operated the vehicle.

Was the Driving Reckless?

A bad result does not necessarily mean the driving was reckless.

We examine speed, traffic, road conditions, distractions, visibility, witness testimony, vehicle data, surveillance footage, and crash reconstruction evidence.

A momentary mistake and conscious disregard of a substantial risk are not the same thing.

Was the Defendant Actually Impaired?

A positive alcohol or drug test does not end the analysis.

Blood concentration and impairment are related issues, but they are not always identical.

We look at:

  • Driving behavior;

  • Officer observations;

  • Medical treatment;

  • Injuries;

  • Field sobriety testing;

  • Blood or breath results;

  • Prescription medications;

  • Toxicology;

  • Testing procedures;

  • Timing.

Did the Defendant Cause the Injury?

A prosecution must prove proximate cause beyond a reasonable doubt.

Crash reconstruction can become critical when another vehicle, road condition, mechanical issue, or other event contributed to what happened.

Does the Injury Qualify as Serious Bodily Injury?

We review the medical evidence rather than relying only on the language used in the police report.

An injury must actually fit Colorado’s statutory definition.

Was the Evidence Lawfully Obtained?

Vehicular assault investigations can involve search warrants, hospital records, blood draws, vehicle searches, event data recorders, cell phones, surveillance footage, and statements made at the scene.

Each source of evidence should be reviewed independently.

What Should You Do After Being Arrested?

If you are being investigated for vehicular assault, the early stages of the case matter.

A few basic steps can protect you:

  1. Do not give investigators a detailed statement without speaking with an attorney.

  2. Do not discuss the crash on social media.

  3. Preserve photographs, video, dashcam footage, text messages and other evidence.

  4. Write down what you remember while the events are still fresh.

  5. Follow every bond condition.

  6. Attend every court date.

  7. Speak with a criminal defense attorney before making decisions about interviews, testing or plea negotiations.

For more information about what happens after charges are filed, see What Does a Criminal Defense Lawyer Do?.

Vehicular Assault Versus Other Colorado Assault Charges

Vehicular assault is different from first, second, or third-degree assault.

Traditional assault charges often focus heavily on what the defendant intended or knew.

Vehicular assault focuses on driving or operating a motor vehicle, the defendant’s level of impairment or recklessness, causation, and serious bodily injury.

For a broader explanation, see our guide to the different degrees of assault under Colorado law and our page explaining second-degree assault in Colorado.

Injured in a Serious Crash?

The criminal prosecution and a personal injury claim are separate cases.

The district attorney prosecutes the criminal charge on behalf of the State of Colorado.

An injured person may separately have a civil claim seeking compensation for medical expenses, lost income, pain and other damages.

Our Colorado Springs personal injury page discusses civil injury cases.

Talk With a Colorado Springs Vehicular Assault Lawyer

Vehicular assault is a felony charge with consequences that can last far beyond the criminal case.

These cases often involve several separate areas of evidence at the same time, including toxicology, crash reconstruction, medical records, DUI law, constitutional search-and-seizure issues, and Colorado sentencing law.

McDowell Law Firm represents people charged with serious traffic crimes, DUI offenses and felony criminal cases in Colorado Springs and throughout the Pikes Peak region.

Josh McDowell is a former prosecutor who personally handles the firm’s criminal cases.

If you have been charged with vehicular assault or believe you are under investigation, contact us to discuss the facts of your case.

You can also visit our Colorado Springs DUI defense page or our criminal defense page.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is vehicular assault a felony in Colorado?

Yes. Vehicular assault is a felony under C.R.S. 18-3-205.

DUI vehicular assault is a class 4 felony. DWAI and reckless-driving vehicular assault are class 5 felonies.

Can I be charged with vehicular assault if the other person only broke a bone?

Yes.

Colorado’s definition of serious bodily injury specifically includes breaks and fractures. A fracture can therefore satisfy the injury requirement even when it is expected to heal.

Do prosecutors have to prove that I intended to hurt someone?

For DUI vehicular assault, no.

The statute expressly makes that version a strict liability crime. The prosecution must still prove DUI, serious bodily injury, and proximate causation.

For reckless vehicular assault, the prosecution must prove reckless driving.

Is careless driving causing serious bodily injury also a felony?

No.

As of June 2, 2025, careless driving that proximately causes serious bodily injury is a class 1 misdemeanor traffic offense.

That is different from reckless vehicular assault, which is a class 5 felony.

Is careless driving a lesser-included offense of reckless vehicular assault?

Not automatically.

Colorado appellate courts have held that careless driving is not a lesser-included offense of reckless vehicular assault.

Can police force a blood draw in a vehicular assault investigation?

Colorado law gives officers substantial authority to obtain testing when they have probable cause to believe a person committed alcohol or drug-related vehicular assault.

Whether a particular blood draw was constitutional and admissible still depends on the facts.

What is the bond for vehicular assault in Colorado Springs?

The current Fourth Judicial District reference schedule lists $10,000 for vehicular assault involving alcohol or drugs.

That is only a reference amount. A judge determines bond based on Colorado law and the circumstances of the individual defendant and case.

Does a DUI conviction merge with DUI vehicular assault?

Generally, yes.

Colorado courts have held that DUI is a lesser-included offense of DUI vehicular assault. Separate convictions based on the same conduct cannot ordinarily remain after merger.

Sources

Additional Reading

The post Vehicular Assault in Colorado: Charges, Penalties and Defenses first appeared on McDowell Law Firm.



from McDowell Law Firm https://mcdowellfirm.com/vehicular-assault-colorado/
https://mcdowellfirm.com/practice-area/dui-defense/

Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Colorado Helmet Law: Who Must Wear One and Who Doesn’t

Colorado does not require adults to wear a motorcycle helmet. Anyone under 18 who drives or rides on a motorcycle, autocycle or low-power scooter must wear one while the vehicle is moving. That is the short answer, and it comes straight from C.R.S. § 42-4-1502. The longer answer has a few wrinkles that matter: what counts as an approved helmet, what the penalty is, how eye protection fits in, what the rules look like for e-bikes, and why “legal to ride without one” does not always mean “no consequences after a crash.”

We practice in Colorado Springs and see what happens on the road and in the aftermath. This guide explains the law as it stands in 2026, in plain terms. It is general information, not advice for your specific situation.

Mcdowellfirm
Get Guidance After a Motorcycle Crash
If a crash left you injured, McDowell Law Firm handles personal injury cases and provides personalized attention to clients in Colorado Springs.

Visit McDowell Law Firm

The Short Version

  • Adults 18 and older do not have to wear a motorcycle helmet under Colorado law.

  • Riders and passengers under 18 generally must wear one while riding on a motorcycle, autocycle, or low-power scooter.

  • The helmet must meet federal motorcycle helmet standards and be properly secured.

  • Eye protection is required for motorcycle riders and passengers on public highways, even for adults.

  • Violating the helmet requirement is a Class A traffic infraction.

  • Class 3 e-bike riders under 18 must wear a helmet.

  • An adult rider’s legal decision not to wear a helmet generally cannot be used to establish comparative negligence or reduce damages in a Colorado personal injury case.

Which young Colorado riders must wear helmets

Colorado’s Motorcycle Helmet Law

Colorado’s helmet law is found in C.R.S. § 42-4-1502.

The statute requires anyone under 18 who drives or rides as a passenger on a motorcycle, autocycle, or low-power scooter on a roadway to wear a protective helmet.

The Colorado General Assembly’s summary of the helmet law confirms that the requirement applies to passengers too.

That means a 17-year-old riding on the back of a motorcycle driven by a 40-year-old still has to wear a helmet, even though the adult driver does not.

The statute also requires the helmet to be properly secured with a chin strap while the motorcycle is moving.

The Colorado State Patrol’s motorcycle law page provides a useful overview of Colorado’s motorcycle rules.

What Kind of Helmet Is Required?

For riders under 18, qualified helmets must meet certain criteria.

Colorado requires a helmet designed for motorcycle use that meets or exceeds Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 218, the federal DOT motorcycle helmet standard.

The helmet must include appropriate lining, padding, and a chin strap.

In practical terms, look for a legitimate DOT-compliant motorcycle helmet rather than a novelty helmet that simply looks like one.

Are There Any Exceptions?

There is a narrow exception involving certain autocycles.

A person riding in an autocycle does not have to wear the otherwise required helmet if the vehicle meets the requirements stated in the statute.

If you own or drive an autocycle, it is worth reading the full text of C.R.S. § 42-4-1502 because the exception depends on how the vehicle is constructed.

For a normal two-wheel motorcycle, the exception does not apply.

What Is the Penalty for Riding Without a Required Helmet?

A violation of C.R.S. § 42-4-1502 is a Class A traffic infraction.

That is a traffic violation, not a criminal offense. It does not carry jail time.

If a minor receives a motorcycle citation, however, I would still look at exactly what was charged rather than assuming it is insignificant. Motorcycle stops can involve other allegations involving licensing, equipment, careless driving, speeding, or other traffic offenses.

You can read more in our guide to Colorado traffic fines and points.

We also explain how long a traffic ticket stays on your record.

Eye Protection Is Required Even for Adults

This is probably the part of Colorado motorcycle law that surprises people most.

An adult can legally ride without a helmet.

The adult cannot simply ride with no eye protection.

Colorado law generally requires the driver and passengers of a motorcycle on a public highway to wear qualifying goggles or eyeglasses, or use qualifying eye protection incorporated into a helmet.

The Colorado State Patrol’s motorcycle law page specifically notes that a windshield does not count as adequate eye protection for an ordinary motorcycle.

So an adult rider can legally skip the helmet but still receive a citation for riding without the required eye protection.

Violation of the eye-protection requirement is also a Class A traffic infraction.

If you are cited for a traffic or equipment offense, you can learn more about our Colorado Springs traffic defense practice.

We also explain when a traffic ticket can become a criminal charge in Colorado.

Rider wearing safety glasses beneath a raised visor

Colorado Leaves the Helmet Decision to Adult Riders

Colorado has made a fairly clear policy choice.

Adults are allowed to decide whether to wear a motorcycle helmet.

That does not mean helmets are ineffective.

According to the Colorado Department of Transportation, motorcycle crashes continue to account for a significant number of traffic fatalities in Colorado.

CDOT reported that 165 motorcyclists were killed on Colorado roads in 2024. The number dropped to 148 in 2025.

CDOT has also reported that nearly half of the motorcyclists killed in Colorado during a recent five-year period were not wearing helmets.

Those statistics do not tell us whether a helmet would have prevented a particular death. They do explain why state safety agencies continue to encourage riders to use them.

The Colorado State Patrol’s protective gear guidance recommends a DOT-compliant helmet along with riding boots, gloves, and protective clothing.

So the legal answer and the safety answer are two different questions.

The legal answer is simple. If you are 18 or older, Colorado does not require you to wear a motorcycle helmet.

What Happens If You Are Injured While Riding Without a Helmet?

This is where the law gets interesting.

Suppose another driver runs a red light and hits a motorcyclist. The rider suffers a serious head injury and was not wearing a helmet.

Can the driver’s insurance company argue that the motorcyclist caused part of his own injuries by choosing not to wear one?

For an adult rider, Colorado case law says no.

The Colorado Supreme Court addressed this issue in Dare v. Sobule.

The Court held that evidence of a motorcyclist’s failure to wear a helmet could not be used to establish comparative negligence or reduce damages.

Colorado does not impose a legal duty on an adult motorcyclist to wear a helmet. The Court declined to create one through civil negligence law when the legislature had chosen not to require helmets.

Colorado appellate courts have continued to recognize that rule.

That is an important distinction.

Colorado does use comparative negligence in personal injury cases. If your own negligent conduct contributed to an accident, your compensation may be reduced, and you can be barred from recovery if your responsibility reaches the statutory threshold.

But an adult’s lawful decision not to wear a motorcycle helmet cannot simply be turned into comparative negligence.

An insurer may still investigate every other part of a motorcycle accident, including speed, lane position, impairment, visibility, braking, and the actions of both drivers. Helmet nonuse, however, is treated differently under Colorado law.

If another driver’s careless driving caused the crash, our article on careless driving causing injury explains some of the issues that can arise.

What Should You Do After a Motorcycle Accident?

Motorcycle crashes can produce serious injuries even when the rider initially feels capable of walking away.

Get medical care.

Call law enforcement and make sure the accident is documented.

Photograph the vehicles, roadway, debris, traffic signals, skid marks, and any visible injuries if you can safely do so.

Keep your helmet, clothing, damaged motorcycle equipment, and other physical evidence.

Get contact information from witnesses.

Be careful about giving a detailed recorded statement to the other driver’s insurance company before you understand your injuries and your rights.

We have a separate guide explaining what to do after a motorcycle accident in Colorado Springs.

If the driver who hit you does not have insurance, read our guide on what to do if you are hit by an uninsured driver in Colorado.

What About E-Bikes?

Colorado treats electric bicycles differently from motorcycles.

There is no statewide helmet requirement for adults riding ordinary bicycles or Class 1 and Class 2 e-bikes.

The Colorado Department of Transportation’s e-bike safety page explains Colorado’s three e-bike classifications.

Class 1 e-bikes provide assistance only while the rider pedals, with assistance ending at 20 mph.

Class 2 e-bikes can provide motor assistance without pedaling, with assistance ending at 20 mph.

Class 3 e-bikes provide assistance while the rider pedals, with assistance ending at 28 mph.

Class 3 bikes have additional restrictions.

A person under 16 generally cannot operate a Class 3 e-bike, although a person under 16 may ride as a passenger.

Anyone under 18 riding a Class 3 e-bike must wear a helmet.

Local governments also have authority over where certain e-bikes can be ridden. Trail, park, and local regulations may therefore be more restrictive than the general statewide rules.

CDOT’s information for bicyclists also covers other bicycle requirements, including lighting and equipment rules.

FAQ

Common Questions About Colorado Motorcycle Helmets

Do adults have to wear motorcycle helmets in Colorado?

No. Colorado does not require a motorcycle operator or passenger who is 18 or older to wear a helmet.

Do minors have to wear helmets?

Yes. A person under 18 generally must wear a qualifying helmet while driving or riding as a passenger on a motorcycle, autocycle, or low-power scooter on a roadway.

Does the helmet have to be DOT approved?

The helmet must meet or exceed the standards contained in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 218, which is the federal DOT motorcycle helmet standard.

Is riding without a required helmet a crime?

No. A violation of the motorcycle helmet statute is a Class A traffic infraction.

Do adults still have to wear eye protection?

Yes. Colorado separately requires qualifying eye protection for motorcycle drivers and passengers on public highways.

Does a motorcycle windshield count as eye protection?

Not by itself for an ordinary motorcycle.

Can an insurance company reduce my motorcycle accident claim because I was not wearing a helmet?

For an adult rider, Colorado appellate courts have held that failure to wear a motorcycle helmet cannot be used to establish comparative negligence or reduce damages.

Do e-bike riders have to wear helmets?

Colorado requires riders under 18 to wear helmets on Class 3 e-bikes. Class 3 operators generally must also be at least 16 years old.

Talk With a Colorado Springs Motorcycle Accident Lawyer

Motorcycle cases can become complicated quickly.

Drivers often claim they never saw the motorcycle. Insurance companies may dispute speed, visibility, fault, or the extent of the rider’s injuries. Serious motorcycle accidents can also involve substantial medical expenses, lost income, permanent injuries, or wrongful death claims.

McDowell Law Firm represents injured clients in Colorado Springs and throughout the Pikes Peak region.

If you were injured in a motorcycle accident, we can review what happened, explain how Colorado law applies, and discuss your options.

Learn more about our Colorado Springs personal injury practice.

If your issue involves a citation rather than an injury claim, visit our traffic defense practice.

For cases involving minors, you can also learn more about our juvenile defense practice.

Or contact McDowell Law Firm to discuss what happened.

Sources

The post Colorado Helmet Law: Who Must Wear One and Who Doesn’t first appeared on McDowell Law Firm.



from McDowell Law Firm https://mcdowellfirm.com/helmet-law-colorado/
https://mcdowellfirm.com/practice-area/dui-defense/

Monday, October 19, 2026

Lane Splitting in Colorado: What Is Legal and What Isn’t

Mcdowellfirm
Know Your Options After a Motorcycle Crash
McDowell Law Firm represents personal injury clients in Colorado Springs, with tailored strategies and direct communication from attorney Josh McDowell.

Visit McDowell Law Firm

Lane splitting and lane filtering are not the same thing under Colorado law.

Lane splitting, riding between lanes while surrounding traffic is moving, remains illegal in Colorado.

Lane filtering became legal for certain two-wheeled motorcycles on August 7, 2024. But the exception is narrow. The surrounding traffic must be completely stopped, the motorcycle cannot exceed 15 mph, and several other conditions must be met.

The law is also temporary. Colorado’s lane-filtering authorization is scheduled to end on September 1, 2027, unless the General Assembly extends it.

If you ride a motorcycle in Colorado, the distinction matters. A maneuver that begins as legal filtering can become illegal lane splitting as soon as traffic starts moving.

Table of Contents

Visit McDowell Law Firm

Key Takeaways

  • Lane splitting through moving traffic remains illegal in Colorado.

  • Lane filtering is legal only when the statutory requirements are satisfied.

  • The vehicles being passed and traffic in adjacent lanes traveling in the same direction must be completely stopped.

  • The motorcycle cannot travel faster than 15 mph while filtering.

  • Lane filtering applies only to two-wheeled motorcycles.

  • If traffic begins moving, the rider must stop the passing maneuver.

  • Legal lane filtering does not automatically give the motorcycle the right of way or determine fault after a crash.

  • The lane-filtering authorization is currently scheduled to end September 1, 2027.

Lane Splitting vs. Lane Filtering in Colorado

People often use the terms lane splitting and lane filtering interchangeably. Colorado law treats them very differently.

Lane splitting generally means riding a motorcycle between lanes or rows of vehicles while traffic is moving. The Colorado State Patrol describes lane splitting as illegal.

Lane filtering is much narrower. It allows the driver of a qualifying two-wheeled motorcycle to move past stopped vehicles under specific conditions.

The Colorado Department of Transportation describes filtering as allowing motorcycles to slowly pass stopped vehicles traveling in the same direction.

The critical difference is whether traffic is stopped.

It does not matter that traffic is moving only two or three miles per hour. The Colorado filtering exception applies to stopped traffic, not merely slow traffic.

The 15 mph number is also frequently misunderstood. It is the maximum speed of the motorcycle while legally filtering. It does not mean that a rider may travel between vehicles moving at less than 15 mph.

If the cars are moving, the lane-filtering exception generally does not apply.

What Colorado’s Lane Filtering Law Requires

Colorado legalized limited motorcycle lane filtering through Senate Bill 24-079.

The law allows the driver of a two-wheeled motorcycle to pass another motor vehicle in the same lane only when the statutory conditions are satisfied.

According to the statute and the CDOT lane-filtering guidance, the important requirements include:

  1. The vehicle being passed must be completely stopped.

  2. Traffic in adjacent lanes traveling in the same direction must also be stopped.

  3. The lanes must be wide enough for the motorcycle to pass safely.

  4. Conditions must permit the motorcycle to be operated prudently while passing.

  5. The motorcycle may not exceed 15 mph while filtering.

  6. The rider may not use the right shoulder to pass.

  7. The rider may not enter a lane of traffic traveling in the opposite direction.

The statute also places restrictions on passing to the right of vehicles in the farthest right-hand lane on certain roads.

The important point is that lane filtering is a narrow exception to Colorado’s normal prohibition against riding between vehicles. It is not a general permission to ride between lanes whenever traffic is congested.

What Happens When Traffic Starts Moving?

This is one of the most important parts of the law.

Traffic may be completely stopped when a rider begins filtering. Then the light changes or the congestion begins moving.

Colorado law requires the rider to stop the passing maneuver when the vehicles being overtaken begin moving.

You cannot continue traveling between the lanes simply because the maneuver began legally.

This is also where legal filtering can quickly turn into illegal lane splitting.

The Colorado State Patrol has specifically warned riders about the difference between completely stopped traffic and traffic that is slowly moving. Its guidance on Colorado’s lane-filtering law stresses that filtering does not authorize motorcycles to continue passing once traffic starts rolling.

If surrounding traffic is creeping forward, even very slowly, the statutory filtering exception does not apply.

Which Motorcycles Can Lane Filter?

The law applies only to two-wheeled motorcycles.

The Colorado Department of Transportation specifically explains that e-bikes and electric scooters do not qualify.

Three-wheeled motorcycles also fall outside the lane-filtering authorization.

That distinction can be confusing because Colorado motorcycle endorsements may cover both two-wheeled and three-wheeled motorcycles. The filtering law is narrower than the licensing rules.

If you are operating a motorcycle with three wheels or another vehicle that does not qualify as a two-wheeled motorcycle, you should not assume the lane-filtering exception applies.

Can You Lane Filter on the Shoulder?

No.

Colorado’s filtering law does not give motorcycle riders permission to use the shoulder to bypass stopped traffic.

The law specifically prohibits passing on the right shoulder.

That means a rider cannot simply move onto the shoulder during congestion and characterize the maneuver as lane filtering.

Legal filtering occurs within the roadway under the conditions established by the statute.

Colorado’s Lane Filtering Law Is Temporary

Colorado’s lane-filtering law is currently an experiment rather than a permanent authorization.

The law is scheduled to be repealed on September 1, 2027.

The state is collecting safety information and evaluating the effects of lane filtering. According to CDOT, a report is due before the current authorization expires.

As of October 19, 2026, qualifying lane filtering remains legal.

Unless the General Assembly changes the law, however, the authorization will end September 1, 2027.

Because the law may change, riders should confirm the current status before relying on it.

The CDOT motorcycle lane-filtering page is a good place to check.

Is Lane Splitting Still Illegal in Colorado?

Yes.

Colorado’s new law did not generally legalize riding between lanes.

It created a limited exception allowing certain motorcycles to pass stopped traffic under specified conditions.

Riding between vehicles that are moving remains outside that exception.

The Colorado State Patrol continues to distinguish illegal lane splitting from lawful lane filtering based largely on whether surrounding traffic is moving or stopped.

A rider who travels between moving vehicles could face a traffic citation depending on what occurred.

More serious conduct can potentially result in charges such as careless driving or reckless driving.

Colorado generally classifies reckless driving as a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense. Ordinary careless driving when no bodily injury or death results is also a class 2 misdemeanor traffic offense, although the consequences change when careless driving results in injury or death.

You can read more about those offenses in our guide to careless driving vs. reckless driving.

Traffic convictions can also carry driver’s-license points. Our guide to Colorado traffic fines and points explains how the point system works.

Who Is at Fault in a Lane-Filtering Motorcycle Crash?

The fact that a motorcycle was filtering does not automatically answer the fault question.

Legal lane filtering does not give the motorcycle an unlimited right of way. But the fact that a rider was filtering also does not automatically make that rider responsible for a collision.

Fault depends on what each person did.

Examples include:

  • A motorcycle rider exceeds 15 mph while filtering.

  • The rider continues between vehicles after traffic starts moving.

  • The available space is too narrow to pass safely.

  • A driver suddenly changes lanes while the motorcycle is lawfully filtering.

  • A driver opens a door into the motorcycle’s path.

  • A rider enters an opposing lane while attempting to pass.

  • A rider is lane splitting through moving traffic rather than lawfully filtering.

Each situation presents different evidence.

The Colorado State Patrol’s lane-filtering guidance emphasizes that riders remain responsible for determining whether conditions allow the maneuver to be performed safely.

That does not create an automatic legal presumption that the motorcycle rider caused every filtering accident.

Insurance companies, attorneys, and ultimately a jury may need to evaluate the actions of both drivers.

Colorado Comparative Negligence and Motorcycle Accidents

Colorado allows fault to be divided between people involved in an accident.

That means a motorcycle rider can be partly responsible for a crash without necessarily losing the entire injury claim.

Colorado follows a modified comparative negligence system. If the injured rider is partly negligent, any damages awarded can generally be reduced according to the rider’s percentage of fault.

However, if the injured person is found equally or more negligent than the person from whom recovery is sought, recovery against that person can be barred.

For example, assume a jury determines that a motorcycle rider suffered $100,000 in damages but was 20 percent responsible for the accident.

The recoverable damages could potentially be reduced to $80,000.

That is one reason the precise facts of a filtering accident matter.

Whether traffic was completely stopped, how fast the motorcycle was traveling, where the vehicles were positioned, and whether another driver attempted a sudden lane change can all become important.

Evidence to Preserve After a Lane-Filtering Accident

If you are involved in a motorcycle crash, evidence can disappear quickly.

If you can safely do so, consider preserving:

  • Photographs of the roadway and lane widths.

  • Photographs showing the final positions of the motorcycle and vehicles.

  • Damage to the motorcycle and other vehicles.

  • Skid marks, debris, and scrape marks.

  • Helmet-camera footage.

  • Dashcam footage.

  • Contact information for witnesses.

  • Nearby business or traffic-camera footage.

Medical documentation also matters.

Some motorcycle injuries are obvious immediately. Others may become more apparent after the adrenaline from the crash wears off.

Avoid guessing about your exact speed, distance, or other details when speaking with an insurance company if you do not actually know the answer.

No.

The law gives qualifying riders the option to filter under limited circumstances. It does not require anyone to do it.

A lane may technically be wide enough to pass while still creating a difficult or risky situation.

Large trucks, mirrors, saddlebags, road construction, potholes, turning vehicles, driveways, and distracted drivers can all change the risk.

The Colorado State Patrol and CDOT encourage riders to use judgment.

The legal maximum is 15 mph. That does not mean 15 mph is always a safe filtering speed.

Conditions may require traveling substantially slower or remaining in the traffic lane entirely.

The Colorado Motorcycle Operator Handbook also provides guidance on lane positioning, visibility, and motorcycle safety.

Colorado Motorcycle License Requirements

Colorado requires motorcycle riders to have the appropriate license endorsement.

According to the Colorado DMV:

  • An M endorsement permits operation of two-wheeled and three-wheeled motorcycles.

  • A 3 endorsement is limited to three-wheeled motorcycles.

  • Riders can qualify through motorcycle testing or through an approved Motorcycle Operator Safety Training program.

  • Riders under 18 generally must hold a motorcycle instruction permit for 12 months before receiving the endorsement.

  • Riders under 16 must successfully complete an approved motorcycle safety training program before obtaining a motorcycle instruction permit.

  • Colorado does not issue a separate motorcycle-only driver’s license.

  • Motorcycle endorsements generally must be added through a driver-license office rather than online, by mail, or by phone.

Remember that having an endorsement that allows operation of a three-wheeled motorcycle does not mean that three-wheeled motorcycles qualify for lane filtering.

The filtering statute applies specifically to two-wheeled motorcycles.

If You Were Ticketed for Lane Splitting or Filtering

A traffic ticket is an accusation, not a conviction.

If you receive a citation related to lane splitting or lane filtering, look carefully at the specific offense listed on the ticket.

Useful steps may include:

  1. Keep the ticket and note every court deadline.

  2. Write down what happened while the details are still fresh.

  3. Preserve helmet-camera, dashcam, or other video.

  4. Photograph the road if lane width or roadway configuration matters.

  5. Identify witnesses who saw whether traffic was moving or stopped.

  6. Avoid making unnecessary statements about disputed facts.

  7. Talk with a traffic attorney before automatically paying the citation.

Paying a traffic ticket can amount to accepting the charge and may result in points or other consequences.

Our article on how long a traffic ticket stays on your record explains some of the issues that can follow a traffic conviction.

In a filtering case, seemingly small facts may matter.

Was the traffic actually stopped?

Was an adjacent lane moving?

How fast was the motorcycle traveling?

Was the lane wide enough to pass safely?

Did traffic begin moving during the maneuver?

Video can sometimes answer those questions much more reliably than competing recollections.

How McDowell Law Firm Can Help

I’m Josh McDowell, a Colorado Springs trial attorney and former prosecutor. I limit my caseload so I can personally handle the cases I accept and communicate directly with my clients.

Motorcycle incidents can involve both criminal or traffic issues and personal injury claims.

If you received a citation for careless driving, reckless driving, or another traffic offense, our traffic defense practice can review the charge and the evidence.

If you were injured because of another driver’s actions, our personal injury practice represents people injured in motorcycle, car, and truck accidents, as well as wrongful death cases.

Personal injury cases are handled on a contingency fee of 33-40%, so there is no upfront retainer for the injury claim itself.

If the crash was relatively minor and you are unsure whether you need a lawyer, our article on whether to hire a lawyer after a minor car accident may help.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. Riding between lanes of moving traffic remains illegal in Colorado. Colorado legalized limited lane filtering, which permits qualifying two-wheeled motorcycles to pass stopped traffic under specific conditions.

Yes, as of October 2026. The current authorization allows qualifying two-wheeled motorcycles to filter through completely stopped traffic under the conditions established by Colorado law.

The authorization is currently scheduled to end September 1, 2027 unless lawmakers extend it.

How fast can you go while lane filtering in Colorado?

The motorcycle may not exceed 15 mph while filtering.

Fifteen mph is a maximum, not a recommended speed for every situation. The law also requires conditions to permit prudent operation.

Can traffic be moving while I lane filter?

No.

The vehicle being passed and adjacent traffic traveling in the same direction must be stopped.

If traffic begins moving during the maneuver, the rider must stop overtaking the vehicles.

Can I lane filter on the shoulder?

No.

Colorado’s filtering exception does not permit passing on the right shoulder.

Can I lane filter on an e-bike or electric scooter?

No.

The authorization applies to qualifying two-wheeled motorcycles. The CDOT lane-filtering guidance states that e-bikes and electric scooters do not qualify.

Can a three-wheeled motorcycle lane filter?

No.

The filtering authorization is limited to two-wheeled motorcycles.

Is the motorcycle rider automatically at fault after a lane-filtering accident?

No.

Fault depends on the circumstances of the crash and the conduct of everyone involved.

Whether the motorcycle rider complied with the filtering law will be important, but another driver’s negligence can also contribute to or cause a collision.

Can you get a ticket for illegal lane splitting?

Yes.

The specific citation depends on the facts. Depending on how the motorcycle was being operated, potential offenses may include careless driving, reckless driving, or another traffic violation.

Sources

Motorcycle Lane Filtering, Colorado Department of Transportation

Lane Filtering in Colorado, Colorado State Patrol

Colorado State Patrol Warns Riders to Respect the Colorado Lane Filtering Law

SB24-079 Motorcycle Lane Filtering & Passing, Colorado General Assembly

I’m a Motorcycle Driver, Colorado DMV

Colorado Motorcycle Operator Handbook, Colorado DMV

Crime classification guide: misdemeanor traffic offenses, Colorado General Assembly

This article is general information about Colorado law and is not legal advice for your specific situation.

Colorado lane filtering and splitting comparison

Sources

The post Lane Splitting in Colorado: What Is Legal and What Isn’t first appeared on McDowell Law Firm.



from McDowell Law Firm https://mcdowellfirm.com/lane-splitting-colorado/
https://mcdowellfirm.com/practice-area/dui-defense/

Colorado Make My Day Law: When Can You Use Force Against an Intruder?

Colorado’s “Make My Day” law gives people inside their homes broad protection against intruders. But the law is narrower than many people t...